<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Problogger.com Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whatawookie.com/problogger-com-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whatawookie.com/problogger-com-review/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 17:20:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://whatawookie.com/problogger-com-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2959</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatawookie.com/?p=187#comment-2959</guid>
		<description>Apologies for not continuing this discussion - I&#039;ve been traveling and am only just home.

Denise - I&#039;m sorry if you think I&#039;m victimising people. All I can really say is that at $1.95 a month and the promise of money back I&#039;m not sure how you could think that. While I don&#039;t think what I&#039;m doing will be for everyone we continue to see people signing up and telling me that they value the community. Ultimately though each person has their choice.

In terms of the &#039;government scrutinising these bloggers&#039; - I&#039;m not sure on what grounds you think we need to be scrutinised. I&#039;m just a guy sharing what I know about blogging and setting up a place for people to interact with each other around that topic. I regularly write about how blogging isn&#039;t a get rich quick thing… I&#039;m not sure how I am victimising anyone?

Allyn - I&#039;m not sure what else there is to say. You seem to I argue that &#039;great content is enough&#039; - I&#039;ve never argued that. I do believe that great content is part of how to build an ongoing readership - but only a month back wrote about how it is not the only element in a post &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.problogger.net/archives/2009/09/01/the-myth-of-great-content-marketing-itself/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Myth of &#039;Great Content&#039; Marketing Itself&lt;/a&gt;. Really sorry but I&#039;m not sure where the perception that I&#039;m just about &#039;great content&#039; being the only key comes from. I&#039;ve written thousands of posts on ProBlogger - writing content is just one of many categories of posts.

Griz - &#039;Social networking is nothing more than people like you (Bloggers and Internet Marketers) trying to get other people like you to buy stuff and they don’t.&#039;

I&#039;m sorry but I find your arguments a little odd. For someone who has critiqued those using social media for being closed to SEO I find it odd that you seem so closed to social media where there&#039;s plenty of people around who use it to make a good living.

I personally think you make some good arguments about SEO and how bloggers should widen their perspective - but perhaps there&#039;s some good reason for you to widen yours too? 

In the same way that you and your readers say that you&#039;re thankful that social media proponents ignore SEO because it makes things easier for you guys perhaps there are a few social media people thankful that you guys don&#039;t get social media. I actually think somewhere between the two is some real opportunity.

My experience is that having a well optimised site that targets readers but also driving significant traffic through social media - not to mention having RSS and email subscribers and getting traffic from other sites - all adds to a profitable business.

Anyway - just my two cents worth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies for not continuing this discussion &#8211; I&#8217;ve been traveling and am only just home.</p>
<p>Denise &#8211; I&#8217;m sorry if you think I&#8217;m victimising people. All I can really say is that at $1.95 a month and the promise of money back I&#8217;m not sure how you could think that. While I don&#8217;t think what I&#8217;m doing will be for everyone we continue to see people signing up and telling me that they value the community. Ultimately though each person has their choice.</p>
<p>In terms of the &#8216;government scrutinising these bloggers&#8217; &#8211; I&#8217;m not sure on what grounds you think we need to be scrutinised. I&#8217;m just a guy sharing what I know about blogging and setting up a place for people to interact with each other around that topic. I regularly write about how blogging isn&#8217;t a get rich quick thing… I&#8217;m not sure how I am victimising anyone?</p>
<p>Allyn &#8211; I&#8217;m not sure what else there is to say. You seem to I argue that &#8216;great content is enough&#8217; &#8211; I&#8217;ve never argued that. I do believe that great content is part of how to build an ongoing readership &#8211; but only a month back wrote about how it is not the only element in a post <a href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2009/09/01/the-myth-of-great-content-marketing-itself/" rel="nofollow">The Myth of &#8216;Great Content&#8217; Marketing Itself</a>. Really sorry but I&#8217;m not sure where the perception that I&#8217;m just about &#8216;great content&#8217; being the only key comes from. I&#8217;ve written thousands of posts on ProBlogger &#8211; writing content is just one of many categories of posts.</p>
<p>Griz &#8211; &#8216;Social networking is nothing more than people like you (Bloggers and Internet Marketers) trying to get other people like you to buy stuff and they don’t.&#8217;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry but I find your arguments a little odd. For someone who has critiqued those using social media for being closed to SEO I find it odd that you seem so closed to social media where there&#8217;s plenty of people around who use it to make a good living.</p>
<p>I personally think you make some good arguments about SEO and how bloggers should widen their perspective &#8211; but perhaps there&#8217;s some good reason for you to widen yours too? </p>
<p>In the same way that you and your readers say that you&#8217;re thankful that social media proponents ignore SEO because it makes things easier for you guys perhaps there are a few social media people thankful that you guys don&#8217;t get social media. I actually think somewhere between the two is some real opportunity.</p>
<p>My experience is that having a well optimised site that targets readers but also driving significant traffic through social media &#8211; not to mention having RSS and email subscribers and getting traffic from other sites &#8211; all adds to a profitable business.</p>
<p>Anyway &#8211; just my two cents worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Real Josh</title>
		<link>http://whatawookie.com/problogger-com-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2939</link>
		<dc:creator>The Real Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatawookie.com/?p=187#comment-2939</guid>
		<description>This post turned out to be quite the firestorm, not is a crazy way. But I think a lot has been said here that really shows the divide of personalities and methods. A million ways to skin a cat is often brought up but really if you want to make money online Griz is definitely right about targeting people who are out to buy stuff. One the flip side if you want to participate in the great social pub house and &quot;write&quot; good content and carry on conversations with others then great, do it. I am all for some combination of the two. Since I work from home socialize online is fun and keeps things interesting, but twitter doesn&#039;t pay my bills, probably never will, unless somehow I brand my way to the top of marketing mountain and get asked to speak for lots of money, but I digress.

I love number 2 (griz) and 10 (wookie) http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=problogger.com&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=&amp;aqi=g-s1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post turned out to be quite the firestorm, not is a crazy way. But I think a lot has been said here that really shows the divide of personalities and methods. A million ways to skin a cat is often brought up but really if you want to make money online Griz is definitely right about targeting people who are out to buy stuff. One the flip side if you want to participate in the great social pub house and &#8220;write&#8221; good content and carry on conversations with others then great, do it. I am all for some combination of the two. Since I work from home socialize online is fun and keeps things interesting, but twitter doesn&#8217;t pay my bills, probably never will, unless somehow I brand my way to the top of marketing mountain and get asked to speak for lots of money, but I digress.</p>
<p>I love number 2 (griz) and 10 (wookie) <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=problogger.com&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=&amp;aqi=g-s1" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=problogger.com&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=&amp;aqi=g-s1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chewie</title>
		<link>http://whatawookie.com/problogger-com-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2916</link>
		<dc:creator>Chewie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatawookie.com/?p=187#comment-2916</guid>
		<description>Interesting... http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=site%3Awhatawookie.com%2Fproblogger-com-review%2F&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=&amp;aqi=</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230; <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;q=site%3Awhatawookie.com%2Fproblogger-com-review%2F&#038;aq=f&#038;oq=&#038;aqi=" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;q=site%3Awhatawookie.com%2Fproblogger-com-review%2F&#038;aq=f&#038;oq=&#038;aqi=</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicki</title>
		<link>http://whatawookie.com/problogger-com-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2915</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatawookie.com/?p=187#comment-2915</guid>
		<description>Not protesting, just clearing up the erroneous info you posted about my new site.

Social networking...as I said, I gained customers as a result, and felt it was worth spending some time on. Not a lot of time, but some time (in addition to many other things). 

I am not sure why you are being so defensive.  simply offered a different perspective, and did so in a respectful manner. Honestly, I don&#039;t understand the attack.

On the other hand, Grizzly aren&#039;t known for being warm and fuzzy... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not protesting, just clearing up the erroneous info you posted about my new site.</p>
<p>Social networking&#8230;as I said, I gained customers as a result, and felt it was worth spending some time on. Not a lot of time, but some time (in addition to many other things). </p>
<p>I am not sure why you are being so defensive.  simply offered a different perspective, and did so in a respectful manner. Honestly, I don&#8217;t understand the attack.</p>
<p>On the other hand, Grizzly aren&#8217;t known for being warm and fuzzy&#8230; <img src='http://whatawookie.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Griz</title>
		<link>http://whatawookie.com/problogger-com-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2914</link>
		<dc:creator>Griz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatawookie.com/?p=187#comment-2914</guid>
		<description>Thou dost protest too much - how about a site that is successful built on social media?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thou dost protest too much &#8211; how about a site that is successful built on social media?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
