<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO Vs. Social Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whatawookie.com/seo-vs-social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whatawookie.com/seo-vs-social-media/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 17:20:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Affiliate</title>
		<link>http://whatawookie.com/seo-vs-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-3010</link>
		<dc:creator>Affiliate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 11:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatawookie.com/?p=197#comment-3010</guid>
		<description>I think Digg could be useful as they have &#039;&#039;do follow&#039;&#039; links. Otherwise, I agree that proper SEO is a must ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Digg could be useful as they have &#8221;do follow&#8221; links. Otherwise, I agree that proper SEO is a must ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chewie</title>
		<link>http://whatawookie.com/seo-vs-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-2950</link>
		<dc:creator>Chewie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatawookie.com/?p=197#comment-2950</guid>
		<description>@ SueC - Sue, Alexa is a metric/tool that people have been going by for a long time on the value of a site. It is also probably the worst gauge. Here is where I will play both sides. If these idiots who buy sites based on Alexa ranking want Alexa ranking, then go ahead and take their money. They obviously do enough research and want that to be a primary focus of a site.

 If I was to buy a site, I am certainly not going to look at Alexa. Those numbers can easily be inflated and are absolutely worthless. 

I have sites that have the worst Alexa ranking and yet they get thousands of visitors every month, and then I have other sites that have better Alexa rankings which may get very few visitors. The system is flawed.

Don&#039;t use it as a gauge for your own site unless you are selling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ SueC &#8211; Sue, Alexa is a metric/tool that people have been going by for a long time on the value of a site. It is also probably the worst gauge. Here is where I will play both sides. If these idiots who buy sites based on Alexa ranking want Alexa ranking, then go ahead and take their money. They obviously do enough research and want that to be a primary focus of a site.</p>
<p> If I was to buy a site, I am certainly not going to look at Alexa. Those numbers can easily be inflated and are absolutely worthless. </p>
<p>I have sites that have the worst Alexa ranking and yet they get thousands of visitors every month, and then I have other sites that have better Alexa rankings which may get very few visitors. The system is flawed.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t use it as a gauge for your own site unless you are selling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chewie</title>
		<link>http://whatawookie.com/seo-vs-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-2949</link>
		<dc:creator>Chewie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatawookie.com/?p=197#comment-2949</guid>
		<description>@WordVixen - Thats not a bad point, but I think Digg changed their policy on dofollow links didn&#039;t they ..? err..... Either way, if that&#039;s the best method of getting links then so be it, a link is a link, but relevant links is what gets a site to the top spots. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@WordVixen &#8211; Thats not a bad point, but I think Digg changed their policy on dofollow links didn&#8217;t they ..? err&#8230;.. Either way, if that&#8217;s the best method of getting links then so be it, a link is a link, but relevant links is what gets a site to the top spots. <img src='http://whatawookie.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chewie</title>
		<link>http://whatawookie.com/seo-vs-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-2948</link>
		<dc:creator>Chewie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatawookie.com/?p=197#comment-2948</guid>
		<description>@ Allyn, you sure got the fire burning with your latest. I love the videos and hope to catch a new one soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Allyn, you sure got the fire burning with your latest. I love the videos and hope to catch a new one soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chewie</title>
		<link>http://whatawookie.com/seo-vs-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-2947</link>
		<dc:creator>Chewie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatawookie.com/?p=197#comment-2947</guid>
		<description>@ Make Money - Yes it certainly is, and that is the reason I would rather sit around all day and let people come to me through Google rather than tweet or Facebook to get visitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Make Money &#8211; Yes it certainly is, and that is the reason I would rather sit around all day and let people come to me through Google rather than tweet or Facebook to get visitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
